1.
[syn: fortune, destiny, fate, luck, lot, circumstances, portion]
2. a person's financial situation (good or bad);
- Example: "he found himself in straitened circumstances"
WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006):
circumstances
n 1: your overall circumstances or condition in life (including
everything that happens to you); "whatever my fortune may
be"; "deserved a better fate"; "has a happy lot"; "the luck
of the Irish"; "a victim of circumstances"; "success that
was her portion" [syn: fortune, destiny, fate,
luck, lot, circumstances, portion]
2: a person's financial situation (good or bad); "he found
himself in straitened circumstances"
Moby Thesaurus II by Grady Ward, 1.0:
76 Moby Thesaurus words for "circumstances":
affairs, alentours, ambience, ambit, assessed valuation, assets,
assets and liabilities, borderlands, circle, circuit,
circumambiencies, circumjacencies, compass, concerns,
condition of things, conditions, context, current assets, dealings,
deferred assets, doings, entourage, environing circumstances,
environment, environs, existing conditions, fixed assets,
frozen assets, full particulars, funds, gestalt, goings-on,
habitat, ins and outs, intangible assets, intangibles, life,
liquid assets, march of events, material assets, matters, means,
milieu, neighborhood, net assets, net worth, outposts, outskirts,
perimeter, periphery, precincts, proceedings, purlieus,
quick assets, relations, resources, run of things,
set of conditions, situation, state of affairs, status quo, stock,
stock-in-trade, suburbs, surroundings, tangible assets, tangibles,
the times, the world, total environment, total situation, vicinage,
vicinity, wealth, what happens, whole picture
Bouvier's Law Dictionary, Revised 6th Ed (1856):
CIRCUMSTANCES, evidence. The particulars which accompany a fact.
2. The facts proved are either possible or impossible, ordinary and
probable, or extraordinary and improbable, recent or ancient; they may have
happened near us, or afar off; they are public or private, permanent or
transitory, clear and simple, or complicated; they are always accompanied by
circumstances which more or less influence the mind in forming a judgment.
And in some instances these circumstances assume the character of
irresistible evidence; where, for example, a woman was found dead in a room,
with every mark of having met with a violent death, the presence of another
person at the scene of action was made manifest by the bloody mark of a left
hand visible on her left arm. 14 How. St. Tr. 1324. These points ought to be
carefully examined, in order to form a correct opinion. The first question
ought to be, is the fact possible ? If so, are there any circumstances which
render it impossible ? If the facts are impossible, the witness ought not to
be credited. If, for example, a man should swear that he saw the deceased
shoot himself with his own pistol, and upon an examination of the ball which
killed him, it should be found too large to enter into the pistol, the
witness ought not to be credited. 1 Stark. Ev. 505; or if one should swear
that another had been guilty of an impossible crime.
3. Toullier mentions a case, which, were it not for the ingenuity of
the counsel, would require an apology for its introduction here, on account
of its length. The case was this: La Veuve Veron brought an action against
M. de Morangies on some notes, which the defendant alleged were fraudulently
obtained, for the purpose of recovering 300,000 francs, and the question
was, whether the defendant had received the money. Dujonquai, the grandson
of the plaintiff, pretended he had himself, alone and on foot, carried this
sum in gold to the defendant, at his hotel at the upper end of the rue Saint
Jacques, in thirteen trips, between half past seven and about one o'clock,
that is, in about five hours and a half, or, at most, six hours. The fact
was improbable; Linquet, the counsel of the defendant, proved it was
impossible; and this is his argument:
4. Dujonquai said that he had divided the sum in thirteen bags, each
containing six hundred louis d'ors, and in twenty-three other bags, each
containing two hundred. There remained twenty-five louis to complete the
whole sum, which, Dujonquai said, he received from the defendant as a
gratuity. At each of 'these trips, he says, he put a bag, containing two
hundred louis, that is, about three pounds four ounces, in each of his coat
pockets, which, being made in the fashion of those times, hung about the
thighs, and in walking must have incommoded him and obstructed his speed; he
took, besides, a bag containing six hundred louis in his arms; by this means
his movements were impeded by a weight of near ten pounds.
5. The measured distance between the house where Dujonquai took the
bags to the foot of the stairs of the defendant, "as five hundred and
sixteen toises, which, multiplied by twenty-six, the thirteen trips going
and returning, make thirteen thousand four hundred and sixteen toises, that
is, more than five leagues and a half (near seventeen miles), of two
thousand four hundred toises, which latter distance is considered sufficient
for an hour's walk, of a good walker. Thus, if Dujonquai had been unimpeded
by any obstacle, he would barely have had time to perform the task in five
or six hours, even without taking any rest or refreshment. However strikingly
improbable this may have been, it was not physically impossible. But
6.-1. Dujonquai, in going to the defendant's, had to descend sixty-
three steps from his grandmother's, the plaintiff's chamber, and to ascend
twenty-seven to that of the defendant, in the whole, ninety steps. In
returning, the ascent and descent were changed, but the steps were the same;
so that by multiplying, by twenty-six, the number of trips going and
returning, it would be seen there were two thousand three hundred and forty
steps. Experience had proved that in ascending to the top of the tower of
Notre Dame (a church in Paris), where there are three hundred and eighty-
nine steps, it occupied from eight to nine minutes of time. It must then
have taken an hour out of the five or six which had been employed in making
the thirteen trips.
7.-2. Dujonquai had to go up the rue Saint Jacques, which is very
steep; its ascent would necessarily decrease the speed of a man, burdened
and encumbered with the bags which he carried in his pockets and in his arms.
8.-3. This street, which is very public, is usually, particularly in
the morning, encumbered by a multitude of persons going in every direction,
so that a person going along must make an infinite number of deviations from
a direct line; each by itself, is almost imperceptible, but at the end of
five or six hours, they make a considerable sum, which may be estimated at a
tenth part of the whole course in a straight line; this would make about
half a league, to be added to the five and a half leagues, which is the
distance in a direct line.
9.-4. On the morning that Dujonquai made these trips, the daily and
usual incumbrances of this street were increased by sixty or eighty workmen,
who were employed in removing by hand and with machine, an enormous stone,
intended for the church of Saint Genevieve, now the pantheon, and by the
immense crowd which this attracted; this was a remarkable circumstance,
which, supposing that Dujonquai had not yielded to the temptation of
stopping a few moments to see what was doing, must necessarily have impeded
his way, and made him lose seven or eight minutes each trip, which,
multiplied by twenty-six would make about two hours and a half.
10.-5. The, witness was obliged to open and shut the doors at the
defendant's house; it required time to take up the bags and place them in
his pockets, to take them out and put them on the defendant's table, who, by
an improbable supposition, counted the money in the intervals between the
trips, and not in the presence of the witness. Dujonquai, too, must have
taken receipts or acknowledgments at each trip, he must read them, and on
arriving at home, deposited them in some place of safety all these
distractions would necessarily occasion the loss of a few minutes. By adding
these with scrupulous nicety, and by further adding the time employed in
taking and depositing the bags, the opening and shutting of the doors, the
reception of the receipts, the time occupied in reading and putting them
away, the time consumed in several conversations, which he admitted he had
with persons in the street; all these joined to the obstacles above
mentioned, made it evident that it was physically impossible that Dujonquai
should have carried the 300,000 francs to the house of the defendant, as he
affirmed he had done. Toull. tom. 9, n. 241, p. 384. Vide, generally, 1
Stark. Ev. 502; 1 Phil. Ev. 116. See some curious cases of circumstantial
evidence in Alis. Pr. Cr. Law, 313, 314; and 2 Theorie des Lois Criminelles,
147, n.; 3 Benth. Jud. Ev. 94, 223; Harvey's Meditations on the Night, note
35; 1 Taylor's Med. Jur. 372; 14 How. St. Tr. 1324; Theory of Presumptive
Proof, passim; Best on Pres. SSSS 187, 188, 197. See Death; Presumption;
Sonnambulism.